Reflections on Anger

It has been difficult to write recently without making some reference to the level of anger being expressed in so many ways by so many people. In Australia we have the spectre of politicians expressing their anger by taking revenge on colleagues from their own political party in government, urged on by the increasingly vociferous attacks from the angry men who hold sway on some radio programs. These government leaders of our society, tasked with providing effective government, seem to have forgotten that it is best achieved by building relationships based on trust. This is certainly not achieved in an atmosphere of “threats, intimidation and bullying” as one female Cabinet Minister admitted publicly. The men call it “robust conversation”, but I wonder if they mean it the way Jim Killen and Fred Daly did? Sir James Killen was a member of the Liberal Party Government from 1955 to 1972 and again from 1975 to 1983. Fred Daly was a member of the Labor Party Government from 1972 to 1975, having been a member of Parliament since 1943. Both men had “robust conversations” many times in Parliament and in the media, but had so much respect for each other that Jim Killen wrote the preface to Fred Daly’s collection of political memoirs. I could not imagine Tony Abbott writing a similar preface for anything Malcolm Turnbull will write, and they are supposedly on the same side of the political fence?

There is a culture of anger based on frustration and fear in our society that needs to be understood. Anger cannot be denied, it is a normal part of the human condition, but it should be understood. To unleash anger in the name of improvement is the real problem. Anger, based on frustration and fear, denies the person confronting the opportunity to respond in a positive way. The only response to anger is more frustration, more fear, more anger. It builds a cycle of destruction that is the antithesis of trust, effective leadership and positive relationships. That is why the bullying, intimidation and threats that our leaders demonstrated as their preferred mode of achieving their goal in recent times is so disturbing. It destroys effective government, it does not provide it.

Last night on National Television, Alan Jones, the man who described himself as “very comfortable” with his “privileged position” that enabled him to “manipulate and paralyse our parliament”, as one questioner put it, advised one female Liberal Party member who had complained of bullying to “take a teaspoon full of cement and toughen up”. Alan has been a radio “shock-jock” in Sydney for many years and has built a reputation as being a leader of reactionary conservative views with his angry tirades against any alternative view to his own. He is one of many angry men who seem to have a hold on radio especially in Sydney. They use their anger to build an audience of frustrated people who resent changes and do not want to consider any reason to question. It is a view of the world that is too prevalent in this society of goal-oriented achievers who want to protect their place and position against any threat they perceive. That is the fear they base their anger on, that is reason we have a leadership of destroyers, not builders.

To build a positive future we need to accept and understand who we are and how we have got here. Only then can we hope to start the conversations that are so desperately needed to enable us to grow. I live in hope and offer this image for reflection. Peace.

Maleny (3)

9 thoughts on “Reflections on Anger

  1. Well said. The rise of the angry far right is troubling – to say the least. I am hoping for an early election and that the Australian people will see past these angry radio personalities. They are being given far too much attention at present.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. That’s a very interesting point about the culture of the macho men. I think you’re onto something there. It doesn’t explain everything, of course, but I think it explains a lot of what we’re seeing around the world these days.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Something I believe I’ve been seeing is gratuitous outrage — anger for the sake of self-entertainment. People seek out a source that provokes them to it.
    My hopes lay in the great number of decent people I meet who are concerned about the situation and who refuse to become part of the problem.
    Sorry to hear this sort of thing is on the rise in Australia too. I’m from America and I blame both Rupert Murdock and Rush Limbaugh for getting this stuff started here.


    1. I didn’t know who Rush Limbaugh was and just looked him up. Wow! He sounds like our Alan Jones on steroids! One note was interesting – apparently he earned $70 million last year! What is it with these talk-show hosts? I think you’re right that people seem to want to listen to something that makes them angry – perhaps to feel alive? I know Rupert Murdoch has made his career out of catering to that lowest aspect of humanity, the fear response. I’m ashamed to admit he’s Australian!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. That makes us even, Jim. I’m ashamed Limbaugh is American. This is the first I heard of Jones. I feel for you. These jerks only do damage.

        A lot of our talk show hosts have no higher education and seemingly much contempt for anyone who has earned a degree — especially more than one. Their ideas are the very opposite of well informed.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s